도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Although the Defendant appealed on the ground that the sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, in light of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments in the instant case, even if considering the circumstances leading to the Defendant’s drinking driving and the distance of drinking driving, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable on the ground that the sentence imposed by the Defendant is too unreasonable on the grounds stated in its reasoning.
Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.
[However, the part of the "Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of a sound driving)" in the relevant legal column for criminal facts in the application of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected to "Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the former Road Traffic Act (the Act was amended by Act No. 15530, Mar. 27, 2018 and enforced March 28, 2019)" (the point of a sound driving).