폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not constitute assaulting the victims in collaboration with the conduct only when the dispute was raised.
2. In the judgment below, the defendant asserted the same purport as the above reasons for appeal, but the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case by compiling the evidence duly admitted and investigated, and rejected the defendant's above assertion on the grounds of detailed reasons under the title of "decision on the argument of the defendant B and the defense counsel". It seems that the victim F did not directly photograph the defendant's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's statement cannot be viewed as a circumstance that could undermine the victim's credibility of the victim's statement, and it is difficult to believe that D's statement by the witness D is in the co-offender's status as to the facts charged
The defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.
3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.