An application for remedy by an applicant for remedy shall be dismissed.

2. In addition, compared to the judgment of the court below on the grounds for appeal, there is no change in the conditions of sentencing in this court, and the sentencing of the court below is difficult to deem that it exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, and considering the defendant's age, character and conduct, character and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's sentencing conditions as stated in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is not accepted.

3. An applicant for a compensation order filed in this court with a claim for payment of money calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from the day following the service date of a copy of the application for compensation order to the day of complete payment, which was obtained by deceptive money which was not received from the Defendant, but also from the day of service of a copy of the application for compensation order. However, the Defendant repaid the applicant for compensation of KRW 3,00,000 on September 29, 2020 to the day of full payment, which constitutes a case where the existence or scope of the liability for compensation is unclear and thus it is impossible to issue a compensation order.

Therefore, the application for compensation order by the applicant for compensation should be dismissed.

4. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and the application for compensation order by the applicant for compensation is dismissed in accordance with Article 25 (3) 3 and Article 32 (1) 3 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings. It