However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 29, 2018, at around 01:00, the Defendant: (a) opened a corrected door and intruded into a warehouse using three compact lines previously owned; and (b) stolen KRW 450,000,000 in cash owned by the victim and stored in the parked cargo vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act, steals cash by intrusion upon the company he/she had worked, and the fact that the crime is not good, and the defendant has a record of being punished for the same kind of crime is disadvantageous.

However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, including the fact that the defendant led to the crime of this case, and the mistake is divided, that the victim does not want punishment by agreement with the victim, and that the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.