On March 3, 2016, the Defendant entered into a long-term rental contract for the victim B corporation and CNAS car in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and operated E in Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-si.

The reason was that the Plaintiff would faithfully pay the monthly rent of KRW 1,020,000 for 48 months if the Plaintiff lent the car at the time of width between 48 months.

However, in fact, the “E” registered in the name of the Defendant was a business entity without any substance, and the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay rent to the victim for each month, and was a plan to receive a car from the injured party and dispose of it as a “large-scale car.”

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, acquired the vehicle from the victim by obtaining the Cpps car amounting to KRW 51,590,000 at the market price at around that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Complaint;

1. Investigation report (the details of registration of automobiles owned by a suspect);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a long-term lease contract for automobiles, E business registration certificate, registration certificate, text details;

1. In light of the following facts: (a) the applicable legal provisions on criminal facts under Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) the considerable amount of damage inflicted upon the reason for sentencing the sentence of imprisonment without prison labor is not specified; and (c) the fact that there is no record of the same kind of crime; and (d) the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act are comprehensively considered in determining punishment as ordered.