구상금
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff, Defendant C, D, E, and F are children between the deceased G and Defendant B.
B. On December 30, 1967, the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City H 3rd 4th 8th Y was divided into I or J on several occasions. Of these, the registration of ownership transfer for K 2,082 square meters was completed for the remaining land, and the registration of ownership transfer for the remaining land was completed for G (the family members of the plaintiff and the defendants), M, N,O, P, Q, etc. The two lots of K and R 2 were jointly replaced with the SJ 635.8 square meters and the 3,062.9 square meters for the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City T-gu 3,062.92. The above disposition of replotting became final and conclusive on April 3, 1982. Since the public official entrusted with replotting by the Mayor of Seoul Special Metropolitan City, a project operator, completed the registration of land substitution, the above 2nd 2nd 6th m2 land was jointly owned with the above land and the above 6th m20 m2.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2-1 to Gap evidence 3-8, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The parties' assertion
A. The plaintiff's assertion (1) as the designated party of the defendants who died of G, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit claiming ownership transfer registration against other co-owners, including M, N, Q, P, andO, Seoul District Court Order 96Kahap13478 (Supreme Court Decision 97Na27819, May 7, 1997), Seoul High Court Order 97Na27819, and Supreme Court Decision 99Da5472 (Supreme Court Decision 92Da9528, Jul. 28, 1993), Seoul District Court Order 93Na3618 (No. 12, 1995); Supreme Court Order 95Da49387 (No. 14, 197); Supreme Court Decision 95Da49377 (No. 14, 1997); and Supreme Court Decision 92Da139475, Oct. 14, 1997).