When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 24, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment by the Seoul Eastern District Court due to a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 25, 2015.

1. On May 6, 2015, at around 10:45, the Defendant damaged the property equivalent to KRW 1,100,000 at the market price, such as: (a) the Defendant, at the safety situation room in C Casino Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., which is located in Gangwon-gun Group B, was dissatisfied with the notification of the suspension of entry due to the act of the customer of the bonds, and was informed of the suspension of entry; and (b) the Defendant, at the expense of the customer, was able to walk up to the customer and walk up to the customer.

2. In the time and place mentioned in paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) dupliced the bat of the above victim, thereby pushing the victim about about 2 weeks of treatment; and (b) cuplicated dump, etc. in need of treatment.

3. The Defendant interfered with his duties, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph 1, committed the above act and continued to avoid humiliation and disturbance, thereby interfering with the Defendant’s duty to maintain order in the casino business site.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. Each statement of E and F preparation;

1. A complaint, a written complaint, a photograph of the closure of a field image, a quotation, a medical certificate of injury, a criminal investigation report (at the time of dispatch to the site), and a criminal investigation report (report on review of video data);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, written judgments, personal identifications, and current status of expropriations;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment, Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of damage to property, the selection of fines), Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of harm, the selection of fines) and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business and the selection of fines);

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The Defendant, on May 6, 2015, is a stock company of 10:45 on May 6, 201, C.