손해배상(자)
1. The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiff 21,63,370 won, Plaintiff B, and C respectively, and each of the above amounts.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. On September 10, 2016, Defendant E driving a Fsi (hereinafter “instant taxi”) around 02:10 on September 10, 2016, and driving a single lane in front of the Daegu-gu G building at a speed of 46km per hour from H bank to the front side of the 46km.
I cross the right side from the left side of the running direction of the above taxi, and Defendant E neglected to neglect the front line, thereby receiving I’s right side side part of the I’s right side in front of the left side of the above taxi.
I was hospitalized in J Hospital by suffering from the above accident, and was hospitalized in J Hospital on September 16, 2016 while being hospitalized in the above hospital, and died on September 16, 2016.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). Plaintiff A is the husband of the deceased I (hereinafter “the deceased”), and Plaintiff B and C are the children of the deceased.
Defendant D’s federation (hereinafter “Defendant D’s federation”) is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement for automobile accident compensation with respect to the instant taxi.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 5, 9, 10 evidence, Eul evidence 1 and video (including branch numbers for those with branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts of recognition as the ground for recognition of liability for damages, Defendant E is the driver of the instant taxi, and Defendant E is liable to compensate the deceased and the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the instant accident as a mutual aid business operator for the instant taxi.
Each of the defendants' liability for damages against the plaintiff is in in an in personam joint and several relationship.
C. According to the facts as seen earlier prior to the limitation of liability, the instant accident occurred when crossing the road without permission during the new wall hours that led to the Deceased, and thus, the Deceased was also erroneous for the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damages.
The above negligence of the deceased is calculated as 50%, and the defendants' liability for damages of the accident of this case is limited to 50%.
2. The following separate statements are set forth below within the scope of liability for damages.