성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unafford that each sentence imposed by the court below on the defendants (the defendant A: 2 years of suspended execution, community service hours and additional collection 10 million won in the month of suspended execution, Defendant B, and C: 1 year of suspended execution and additional collection 5 million won in the month of suspended execution in 8 months) is too unafford and unfair.
2. The act of arranging sexual traffic does not have much social harm, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, which is disadvantageous to the Defendants.
On the other hand, the defendants recognize all the crimes of this case and reflect their mistakes, and all the defendants have no record of punishment in excess of the same criminal record or fine, and the fact that the period of the crime of this case is relatively short is favorable to the defendants.
Taking full account of the aforementioned circumstances and the degree of the Defendants’ participation in the instant crime, the amount acquired therefrom, the age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant records and pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime, it cannot be deemed that each sentence imposed by the lower court is too uneasible and unfair.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.