도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On June 18, 2002, around 05:32, 200, the Defendant’s employee A violated the restriction on vehicle operation of a road management agency by operating a 11.4t knife onto the 2 knife, exceeding 10 knife of B freight vehicles owned by the Defendant, in front of the J. 83.45 knife of the Southern Sea Highway branch office, in excess of 10 knife of the 10k weight of B freight vehicles owned by the Defendant. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 17568, Jun. 25, 2002; Presidential Decree No. 13. 13884, Jun. 25, 2002>
2. The prosecutor of the judgment applied Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation provided for in Article 83(1)2 in Article 86 of the above Act, the Constitutional Court shall be punished by a fine provided for in the corresponding Article, even the corporation."
3. As such, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.