공직선거법위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence of the court below [the suspended sentence (the suspended sentence: a fine of three million won)] is too unhued and unfair.
2. The crime of publishing false facts for the purpose of leading the defendant to the end in the regular Eup market E is not good. However, the defendant's depth is against the defendant, E also accepted the defendant's apology and withdrawn the complaint, the defendant has no other criminal records other than the past sentenced to a fine of 40 years, and the crime of this case also refers to the defendant's statement from co-defendant A of the original court, and the defendant is old and economically difficult, and the punishment of the court below against the defendant is examined based on favorable circumstances such as the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act and the range of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are shown in the records and arguments of this case, including favorable circumstances such as the defendant's age and economic difficulty. In light of the court below's examination of the defendant's punishment against the defendant, it is not unreasonable to suspend the sentence of a fine of 3 million won against the defendant. Thus, the prosecutor's grounds for appeal is rejected
3. According to the conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.