2. The defendants' confession of the crime of this case and there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, Defendant B and Defendant C want to leave the front offender, and the K K who paid the brokerage commission to the defendants wanting to commit the crime of this case. However, the crime of this case is committed by Defendant A's act of taking unfair profits by means of deceiving the purchaser, including N et al., who received a high amount brokerage commission and received a high amount brokerage commission, and thus the crime is not good. The defendants asserted that the above defendant exceeded the commission of legal brokerage commission. However, according to the statement at the investigation agency of Defendant B's investigation agency, according to the above defendant B's statement, it appears that the above defendant demanded K to demand the commission of brokerage commission of KRW 4,00 per square day, and each of the defendants' commission of legal brokerage commission exceeded five times, and the defendants' age, age, sex, circumstances, motive, and circumstances leading to the crime of this case after considering all the criminal acts of this case. Thus, the court below's argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.