2. The circumstances to be considered, such as the Defendant’s time to commit the instant crime and the first offender with no record of criminal punishment, are recognized.

However, the defendant provided a third party who may know his identity with the victim's photograph, which resulted in a considerable risk of spreading the victim's photograph to many and unspecified persons, the victim seems to have received a considerable mental impulse due to the crime of this case, and the victim failed to reach an agreement with the victim, and the victim wanted to punish the defendant, the defendant's liability is not exceptionally imposed.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, there is no special change of circumstances that make the original judgment and the punishment different from the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.