If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On November 29, 2015, the Defendant committed a crime on November 29, 2015, on the second floor of the Dong Seoul bus terminal located in the 50-ro of Seoul Gwangjin-gu, Seoul on November 29, 2015, and on the second floor of the Dong bus terminal, “in-house name is C and the inner wall is lost.”

A false statement was made to the effect that only KRW 10,000 shall be repaid immediately after the next day.

However, in fact, the defendant is not C but C, and did not live in the Cheongdodong, and he was aware of the contact information of the victim in order to keep the victim up, continue to do so and to acquire money, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to complete the payment.

The Defendant received 10,00 won in cash from the injured party, namely, in the name of the borrowed money.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant committing a crime on December 4, 2015, which is located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul around December 16, 2015, 263, around December 4, 2015

In the Orra shopping mall, the victim's rent of 9 million won is to be increased.

At present, there was no money of the party, thereby making a false statement to the effect that if 300,000 won is lent, 9,000 won is to be paid immediately.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any rent from the third party and did not have any intention or ability to pay the rent even if he borrowed the money from the injured party.

The Defendant received 300,000 won in cash from the injured party, i.e., the borrowed money.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving the victim.

3. Around December 5, 2015, the Defendant committed a crime on December 5, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “In the APM shopping mall located in Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the head of Jung-gu, “APM shopping mall, in lieu of the purchase of the immediately full payment after receiving the payment,” to the victim.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the visual amount that the injured party has settled, such as the above paragraph 2.