All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. The Defendant’s punishment (unfair sentencing) sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (a punishment of imprisonment with prison labor of three years and six months and forty hours and orders to complete sexual assault treatment programs) is too unreasonable.

B. Prosecutor 1) The sentence sentenced by the lower court against the Defendant is too unfasible and unfair.

2) It is unfair for the lower court to have exempted the Defendant from issuing a disclosure notification order of personal information disclosure.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant’s judgment on the wrongful argument of sentencing by both parties recognizes all of the instant crimes, and the Defendant is the primary offender who had no record of committing the instant crimes before the instant crimes are favorable to the Defendant.

그러나 피고인은 마약류 취급자가 아님에도 불구하고 수면제나 수면 유도 제를 사용해 본 적이 없어 그 성분이나 효능의 차이 등을 잘 알지 못하는 직장 동료를 이용하여 향 정신성의약품인 졸 피 뎀을 무상으로 건네받는 방법으로 두 차례에 걸쳐 수수한 다음 이를 네 차례에 걸쳐 투약하고, 자신의 주거지에서 졸 피 뎀 성분이 함유된 스틸녹스정을 빻아 가루로 만든 후 물에 타 피해자에게 마시게 하는 방법으로 졸 피 뎀을 사용하고, 위 약물에 취해 잠이 든 피해자를 강간하고, 잠들어 있는 피해자의 하반신 나체와 음부 사진을 촬영함으로써 이 사건 각 범행을 저질렀다.

In light of the fact that the defendant used the trust of the victim, who is a workplace, to commit the crime, used the local mental medicine, and increased sexual humiliation of the victim due to taking photographs of bals, etc., the nature of the crime is extremely poor.

The victim appears to have suffered serious sexual humiliation and physical impulse and pain due to each of the instant crimes by the Defendant, and the victim, in fact, resigned from the workplace after the victim suffered the instant damage, and is extremely vulnerable to extreme stress and fear.