1. Forgery of an official document;

A. On June 22, 2011, the Defendant: (a) entered the “E” office where the Defendant works for Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, into the “E”; (b) obtained a document file stating “written claim for repayment of overdue wages and receipt” under the name of the chief prosecutor of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office; and (c) forged the Defendant’s claim for refund of loans and receipt under the name of the chief prosecutor of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, which is an official document, on the Internet website, with a view to using the falsified as if he/she had been claiming overdue wages in the process of claiming overdue wages; and (d) then entered “A” into the “applicant” column, “Electronic number” column, “13890, 2010, 13895,” “A” in the “Electronic number” column, “19,875,250,” and printed out the same into the same.

B. On June 26, 2011, the Defendant: (a) around June 26, 201, at the Defendant’s residence located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si; (b) received a document file under the name of the head of the Seoul Central District Court (hereinafter “case Number”); (c) entered “Case Number” column into “A” and printed out “A” in the “Case Number; and (d) forged one copy of the application for the receipt of the court deposit deposit account in the name of the head of the Seoul Central District Court; (c) around January 13, 2014, the Defendant sent the document file under the name of the Seoul Central District Court head of the Seoul Central District Court; and (d) entered “Case Number 13895; and (e) entered the document in the name of the Seoul Central District Court in the name of the Seoul Central District Court; and (e) the receipt of the document in the name of the Seoul Central District Court No. 1501, May 13, 2014.