However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 26, 2015, at around 03:25, the Defendant was required to respond to the measurement of alcohol by inserting the breath of a drinking measuring instrument four minutes in a while under the influence of alcohol, such as the Defendant, while driving on the road while driving on the fright of a motor vehicle in the condition of driving on the road, at around 35 minutes, by a slope D belonging to the said police box, and being locked at the fright of a motor vehicle in the direction of driving on the road.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for sobage measurement without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the circumstances of the driver, report on the detection of the driver, and report on the driver;

1. Application of photographs and photographs (a suspect locked on the road)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of penalty, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., reflection of the fact, and absence of any record of punishment sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;