When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is an investigator (B) of the senior branch office of the public prosecutor's office of the Gu government.

No person engaged in criminal justice affairs shall peruse criminal judicial information managed by another institution or another person without authority.

On July 6, 2016, 13:38, 2016, the Defendant was in the head of the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government District Public Prosecutor's Office C, which was located in 213, a white-ro of the head of Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, and was aware of his knowledge.

D through telephone, “The police station in Ansan E was investigated by the Gu E, and no contact is made after it was called.

In any future, it is different to inform where he/she is detained where he/she intends to do so on the same face of the detention." After receiving a request from the prosecutor's office, he/she had access to the information inquiry system of the prosecutor's office and perused the case information of the case.

Accordingly, the Defendant, without authority, accessed and perused the case information of E managed by others.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by each prosecutor with respect to F and D;

1. Application of the response statutes as a result of inquiry by the person who inquireds the information of the case;

1. Relevant Article 15 (3) and Article 14 (2) of the Act on the Promotion of the Digitalization of Criminal Justice Process, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;