However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On August 16, 2014, around 02:51, the Defendant: (a) reported on August 16, 2014 that the Defendant did not pay the taxi fee to C, and (b) called “the Defendant D (Nam, 34 years old) for the victim’s police officer sent out upon receipt of a 112 report that the Defendant did not pay the taxi fee to C.” The Defendant called “the rate shall be set back, the width shall be changed, the name shall be known, and the name shall be known,” (a) the vehicle key to the vehicle in the bals of the bals, the Defendant collected the victim’s face by taking the 10,000 won, and 10,000 won, shall have the victim’s face.”

A. It refers to a Chewing flachi, and continued to have a part of the victim’s face flachie once.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by assaulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. C and E written statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of Belgium and photographer photographic Act and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant is against his/her will and has no record of being sentenced to a fine or more severe punishment);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;