A. Violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act by mistake of facts

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below in the erroneous determination of facts, even though the defendant is not an attorney-at-law, it can be recognized that the defendant received KRW 2.1 million from E on August 30, 2010, and E’s East F was indicted for murder preliminary crimes, and that he/she handled legal affairs, such as preparing documents, by reviewing the contents of arguments and arranging the arguments.

B. In full view of the records of the instant case of unfair sentencing and all the sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per