However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On March 21, 2016, at around 05:10, the Defendant suffered from a special injury: (a) female-friendly job offering Category D, which was located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si C, did not go to the toilet; and (b) thereby, the Defendant she entered the toilet for female-friendly women; (c) when the victim F, who is one of the other women’s day-to-day, f, who is the other party, f, f, which frighting with the other women’s day-to-day, boomed with the victim; (d) when the victim f, who is the other party’s day-to-day, boomed with the other woman’s day-to-day, she suffered from the injury that the victim could not know of the number of days of treatment due to a shoulder-to-ker’

2. The Defendant damaged a wall of glass equivalent to KRW 1.3 million at the market price owned by the victim G by citing beer disease, which is a dangerous thing in the above time, at the above place, and towards the wall wall of the above D glass.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the fourth public trial date);

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of H and F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Relevant Article 258-2(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 257(1) and 369(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under the suspended sentence are as follows: (a) the circumstances leading to the offense in the judgment of the defendant; (b) the situation at the time of the offense; (c) violence committed by the defendant and the degree of damage resulting therefrom; (d) the circumstances after the offense (the victims agreed with the victims; and (e) the defendant’s attitude of reflectivity and criminal records (which may have the record of juvenile protective disposition for violent crimes); and (e) other records and changes in the sentencing