If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On March 23, 2015, the Defendant driven CMP5 car and proceeded at the speed of the U.S. in accordance with the two-lanes from the ju apartment zone to the two-lanes from the jumpung-hun.

Since there are signals indicating the signal apparatus and traffic safety facilities, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to stop the accident by driving with the signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to turn to the left by his occupational negligence in contravention of the signal at the left left turn at the front of the driver’s seat of the victim D(43 years of age, n) driving, who was making a left turn to the left pursuant to the new code, due to his occupational negligence, and shocked the front front part of the driver’s seat of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a closed duplicating dys, which requires approximately six weeks of treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing reasons of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order includes the degree of injury suffered by the victim, the degree of negligence of the defendant, but the primary crime is the primary crime, the vehicle driven by the defendant was covered by comprehensive insurance, the old sentence of the prosecutor, etc.