관세법위반
The Defendants are not guilty. They publicly notify the summary of the judgment of innocence against Defendant B.
1. A summary of the facts charged is a person who actually resides in Ulsan Metropolitan City G, but actually resides in a Thailand and engages in trade mediation and export mediation business in a domestic pelpelpel importer, and Defendant B resides in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H apartment 101-404 and engages in business of importing, mediating, and arranging pelpelpelpellets.
Where anyone intends to import goods, he/she shall report to the head of a customs office the name, size, quantity and price of the relevant goods and other matters prescribed by Presidential Decree, and in such cases, he/she shall not
The Defendants, using the fact that it is difficult to distinguish the external shape, and that the import plant quarantine is conducted only at the entrance of a container, were imported in the name of the non-permanent dispute resolution bank I by using a single-name pellets that conceals low ($119/MT) import prohibited from import under the Plant Disease Control Act (hereinafter referred to as “Woo pelpel”) in the container inside the container, and in the customs office, the Defendants, as if they were processed wood products (hereinafter referred to as “Woo pelpel, $149/MT”), were imported in the name of the non-permanent dispute resolution bank I by using a false-name pelpel pelpel pelpel pelpel pel pel pel pel pel pel pel pel pel pel pel pel pel
On April 15, 2014, the Defendants: (a) concealed pelpellets 66,750km inside each container and loaded pelpellets 150,000 g in each of the container by using the J which departing from Thailand and entering into a optical port; (b) however, the Defendants imported pelpelpel 66,750 g in each of the separate crimes No. 2, as shown in the separate crimes list No. 2; (c) the market price of KRW 15,025,146 (cost KRW 8,408,724) by the method of filing an import declaration (K) in the name of the non-party Lpel pel pelpel 15,000 g; (d) however, the Defendants imported pelpel 66,750 g in each of the separate crimes No. 250 pelpel pel pel pel pel pel pel pel pel 304,5394,295.24.24