However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 16:00 on August 18, 2015, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath in the court of the Seoul Central District Court 318, the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court, the center of Seocho-gu, Seoul, in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) against C and D (joint injury) at the court of 318, and the Defendant took an oath as a witness, and the defense counsel’s “the victim E was tightly damaged by Defendant D’s scam, etc., and scam back to the floor again, and then damaged E’s head.”

D was seated only at the match.

”라고 답변하고, “ 또 피고인 C의 경우에는 E의 목 부분을 잡아 흔들고 머리를 잡아 바닥에 넘어뜨린 후 넘어진 E의 다리를 걷어찼다는 데, 증인은 이러한 광경을 목격하였는가요.

There is no fact in the question "........"

'Magio Bada'

The same shall apply to “I”.

Hashing the body and trying to do so.

I did not know, whether or not.

The Prosecutor respondeded to “I, if so, the truth at the time of the initial police statement, and I am at the time of the person.”

It seems that the important issue of whether or not it has been known has been judged at that time.

In doing so, we now see that it is.

What is the reason why it is.

“h. At that time, I did not reply to the question “....”.

I have no absolute reason to do so.

“......”

However, the problem is that C and D made a good talk about D operation G in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul on September 21, 2012, about 17:30, and that it was in bad talk about E, D and D put up E in the floor by fasting E, etc., and cutting off E's head into the floor by cutting off E's head, and C put off E's bridge after cutting down the part of E's head into the floor and cutting off E's head beyond the upper floor.

Nevertheless, the defendant is against his memory as above.