If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a business operator who purchases high-priced smartphones lost in the taxi at low prices from taxi drivers by expressing his/her intention to purchase a lost mobile phone by turning all mobile phones on all of the mobile phones when an empty taxi passes in the vicinity of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

1. On February 25, 2014, between 02:40 and 03:00, the Defendant purchased 90,000,000 won from each taxi driver in front of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and acquired stolen goods by purchasing 90,00,000 won from each taxi driver, knowing that the victim C lost 820,000 won or more at the market price of 820,000,000 won or more of 5,000 won or more of 60,000 won or more of 60,000 won or more of 60,000 won or more of 5,00 won or more of 6,00 won or more of 4,000 won

2. On February 26, 2014, at around 03:50, the Defendant: (a) promised the Victim G to take over and acquire stolen goods at a price of KRW 60,000, while knowing that the Victim G was a stolen of one cell phone at the price of KRW 600,000 in the F taxi operated by Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E, H, and I;

1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of seized articles;

1. Relevant Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;