If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

At around 15:20 on April 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim D’s desire to the above victim and avoided the disturbance from the above room; (b) expressed that the above victim was punished for the crime of interference with business because of the victim’s desireing to the above victim and avoiding the disturbance at the above room; (c) expressed that the above victim would not open the church to the church, and expressed the victim’s desire to talk with the above victim and “I will not leave the church; and (d) heard that the above victim would continue to be bound by the above victim, “I will leave the church, and will leave the house if you are detained, you will leave the house if you are detained,” and (d) made it impossible for the above victim to receive the customer by avoiding the disturbance for about 20 minutes.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the operation of the above victim's task by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The prosecutor's office and the police's statement concerning D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify a copy of a letter and a department related to reporting a 112 case;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;