When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 21:30 on Jeju Island, and around 21:30 on October 15, 2017, D, a taxi driver of the si on which the former Defendant was aboard, had the police officer of the said si expressed that he would be at the time when he would have expressed the Defendant’s desire to engage in an act of disturbance, such as the Defendant’s bath, to report the act of disturbance, such as the Defendant’s abusiveation, to D; and (b) the developments leading up to the said son’s affiliation, the Defendant interfered with E by stating that he “the same moas” was “E” and pusheded by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officials on the handling of criminal reports and the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of CCTV photographs and photographs to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Imposition of a fine of an appropriate amount in consideration of the fact that the defendant's act of taking a bath or assault against a police officer working for the reason of sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not bad in the nature of the crime, is contrary to the fact that the damage is not large, and that there is no criminal history exceeding the fine, etc.;