When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-Wood vehicle.

On October 30, 2019, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 22:05, and led to turn to the right from the north side of the “D Kimpo-si” front of the “D Kimpo-si” in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.

At this point, there is a crosswalk where traffic control is not carried out, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has been obliged to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk and check whether or not there is a person crossing the crosswalk, and to safely drive the crosswalk by checking well the right and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went into the front part of the above vehicle, thereby crossing the victim G (A, 36 years old) to the right side from the left side of the running direction of the above vehicle where the Defendant was driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a half-time injury, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment include that the degree of injury to the victim is not minor, that the amount agreed upon is paid through an insurance company, that is recognized as a crime, that there is no record of criminal punishment, and that there is no other record of criminal punishment, and that the punishment is determined by taking into account all the sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age