2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

On April 24, 2016, at around 18:50, the Defendant was asked to ask the Defendant questions about the developments leading up to the Defendant’s entry from the slope C belonging to the Busan Police Station B, which was called the captain at around 577 at the coast of the captain of the Busan Gun, for a 112 report. “Around April 24, 2016, the police officers of this knife all of them.”

“In doing so, the said C’s wing part was assaulted one time to walk the body of the said C.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of statutes on the statement protocol to C

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the fact that the crime is not hot, and that the defendant's opinion is found to be erroneous) (see, e.g., the prosecutor's opinion) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e., Supreme Court Decision)