중앙행정심판위원회재결서기각(무변동처분)취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On June 7, 1966, the Plaintiff entered the Navy and discharged the Vietnam War on December 31, 1968.
After a physical examination on November 30, 200, the Plaintiff was registered as a soldier or policeman killed and wounded in action after being judged at Grade VII with respect to the injury of "Sbucks" (beli, left-hand item, and bucks).
B. On October 21, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for additional recognition of the difference in “ bilateral eye”.
As a result of the deliberation on January 20, 2014, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement decided to be wounded only for the "Seoul Franchisium" at the time of previous deliberation. However, according to the country of beds and the confirmation of facts related to the requirements for the distinguished service to the President of the Commander of the Military Corps on December 20, 2013, the Plaintiff’s judgment was confirmed to have been wounded in relation to the "Minchisium" at the time of the so-called "Minchisium" at the time of the so-called Machisium at the time of the so-called in the first deliberation. In addition to the difference newly confirmed at the time of the previous evaluation, the Plaintiff did not notify the "Minchisium" under the name of the original injury in relation to the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State of distinguished service to the Plaintiff, and it did not recognize that the plaintiff did not have any objective evidence other than the Plaintiff’s statement or other equivalent documents during his/her performance of duty."
C. On January 28, 2014, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the fact that the Plaintiff was additionally recognized as a requirement for soldier or policeman wounded in action. On February 26, 2014, the Defendant conducted a physical examination including additional wounds with respect to the Plaintiff, and notified the Plaintiff on April 14, 2014, of the fact that there was no previous classification and change in the disability rating “Class 7 415” to the Plaintiff.
hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case"
(i) 【Unsatisfied facts, i.e., the basis for recognition.