beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2013.11.26 2013고단446

도로교통법위반(음주운전)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that there is no concern about substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his/her right of defense, facts constituting a crime are recognized by rhyming

The Defendant, who violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act in October 31, 2010 and December 17, 2010, violates each of the provisions of Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and who is under the influence of alcohol at the 0.202% of the blood alcohol concentration on October 6, 2013.

From the front day of the room to the front day of the Agricultural Technology Center located in the Eduk-dong, B Corhon car was operated from approximately 1 km to the front day of the Agricultural Technology Center.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, the results thereof, and the statement of the situation of drinking drivers;

1. Application of each summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (no record of punishment exceeding a fine exists);

1. Probation, order to provide community service and attend lectures, Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;