2. Although there are favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant's mistake and reflects, that the defendant recognized his mistake and agreed with the victim F, that the defendant agreed with the victim F, and that the defendant should consider equality with the case of being tried together with the crime of assault in the judgment of the court below, which is a concurrent crime after Article 37 of the Criminal Act with regard to some of the crimes of this case, the defendant has a history of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime. However, in light of the fact that the defendant committed a part of this case repeatedly without being aware of the period of repeated crime, it is highly likely that the risk of repeating a crime is high, most of the damages have not been recovered, and all the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances, frequency of the crime, frequency, etc., are considered, it is not recognized that the punishment imposed by the court below is unfair

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.