The evidence seized shall be confiscated from the accused.

The defendant is a person who operates a game room with the trade name called "C Game Site" on the building B at the prime city and the first floor.

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging the exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

From January 7, 2019 to January 16, 2019, the Defendant established 40 game rooms, and provided 40 game machine for “alleybrine” to customers who have found 10 places, and exchanged 10% of commission by converting the score acquired as a result of the game into 10% per unit.

As a result, the defendant exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect by the prosecution against the defendant or D;

1. Statement by the prosecution concerning D;

1. Each investigation report, on-site photographs, and seizure records;

1. Application of statutes concerning criminal records;

1. Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry for Criminal Facts;

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act of confiscation;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Additional Collection, there are favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant is able to repent his mistake in depth, the act of exchanging the result obtained through the use of a game product in real money in the public is an act that stimulates the speculation of the general public, and thus, it is necessary to strictly prohibit the crime of violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry because it is not likely that the crime of violation of the Act is inevitable, and the corresponding punishment is inevitable. The game machine of the game of this case is not small in total of 40 large prices, and the degree of the defendant's participation as co-offender is the largest, in view of the fact that the crime of this case is committed in this case, the nature of the crime and the circumstances of the crime of this case, and the motive and circumstances of