However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2017. 5. 24. 15:37 경 안산시 단원 구 원곡로 64 군자 농협 앞 노상에서 안산 단원 경찰서 B 파출소 소속 C 경사로부터 무단 횡단으로 통고 처분을 받자 순찰차량 앞에서 ‘ 좃 같은 경찰관들 아, 나한테 얼마나 벌금 주려고 이러냐,

This dogbling h.” This dogbling h.h., and was on board the chief of the patrol vehicle.

The police officer's legitimate execution of duties was interfered with by assault, such as having a site for notification on the side of the C slope.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the compilation of exhibits images;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., the confession and reflect of the accused, and the fact that there is no record of crime in the Republic of Korea);

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;