2. The judgment: (a) the Defendant scrapped the vehicle that the Defendant was wrong and driven; (b) even though it is deemed that the Defendant had a high history of having been punished for driving without a license, and (c) the Defendant again committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution, even though he was sentenced to four times or more due to the commission of the crime, including driving without a license or driving without a license, and (d) caused physical damage within the accident; and (b) it is difficult to prevent the Defendant from repeating the crime due to a heavy punishment such as suspension of execution.

Considering such circumstances and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.