beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.09.19 2016가단130622

유류분반환청구 등의 소

Text

1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 23,749,99 and KRW 10,00,00 among them, the Defendant shall pay KRW 10,000,000 from January 14, 2017.

Reasons

In light of the above legal principles, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to “the deceased’s land”

(2) On July 6, 2015, the ownership transfer transfer on July 16, 2015, Defendant 1, on July 16, 2015, on the gift transfer on July 16, 2015, in the process of acquiring the ownership by 5,00 square meters 435 square meters m287 square meters m287 square meters, which was divided by the above O on August 17, 2009, the land category of which was changed on July 16, 2015, the third party of the ownership transfer transfer transfer transfer on July 16, 2015, the land category of which was 25 square meters m25 square meters m25 m2,000 from the third party of the ownership transfer transfer on July 6, 2004, the land category of which was changed on July 28, 2010, Plaintiff 1, who was divided on July 206, 2016.

* The registration of ownership transfer was completed from D on October 25, 1994 with respect to the Plux 917 square meters (hereinafter “Plux 12 land”) in Macheon-si, Plux Pool-si (hereinafter “Plux 12 land”).

* On February 25, 1986, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the Defendant’s future on the ground of sale and purchase with respect to Q229.8 square meters in the City of Jung-si. On February 26, 1992, on the above land, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the Defendant’s future on February 26, 1992 with respect to the housing and neighborhood living facilities on the fourth floor above the above land (hereinafter “government’s real estate”).

4) On July 17, 2007, E sent KRW 230 million to the bank account in the Plaintiff’s name. (c) On July 22, 2015, the Defendant et al. filed a claim for the cancellation of ownership transfer registration against the Defendant et al. on the premise that the transfer registration of ownership in the name of the Defendant on the land of the deceased was made against the will of the deceased, a former registered titleholder, on the premise that the transfer registration of ownership in the name of the deceased was made against the will of the deceased.