2. The judgment of the court below is recognized as a favorable condition to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and is against the defendant, supporting the wife and two children, and that D corporation does not want punishment against the defendant. However, the crime of this case is deemed to have prepared to prevent the present state building and the nature of the crime is grave, and the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, and other circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing specified in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, circumstance after the crime, etc. are considered to be too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant and his defense counsel's allegation of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.