However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant, at around 17:02:20 on May 17, 2015, followed the victim by drinking alcohol, such as “D” 601, which was located in C, and the victim E (the victim E, 27 years of age, and Ga) who was aware of in the past, and followed the victim in a burg where the victim had the burged breath in advance.

The Defendant: (a) had the victim under the influence of alcohol, she was easy to enjoy at a shock, and forced the victim’s arms to be placed on the floor; and (b) demanded the victim to have sexual intercourse on the part of the victim’s sexual organ, where the victim was laid on the body part of the victim and suffering the Defendant’s sexual organ after getting out of the victim’s sexual organ, but the victim refused to do so; (c) the victim forced the victim’s arms to be placed on the bed; and (d) requested the victim to sexual intercourse by placing the victim’s arms on the bed part of the bed; and (e) she forced the victim’s arms to be placed on the bed part of the bed; and (e) again, demanded the victim’s sexual organ with the victim’s sexual organ going on the part of the victim.

As above, when the victim frightened from the Defendant’s repeated sexual intercourse fleds out of the telecom, the Defendant attempted to drive the victim by forcing the victim to go into the telecom, but the victim saw the victim to go into the telecom and rape, but she did so on the floor of the corridor, and she did so on the wind to escape.

2. The Defendant is not a person handling narcotics, etc.

The Defendant, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, diversed a single-use camcopon (hereinafter referred to as “written copon”) in a single-use injection machine that was received from and possessed by a person with no personal name, and then requested the above E (tentative name) to provide injection to the Defendant’s arms, and administered the Defendant once.

Accordingly, the Defendant administered the Meptamine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. As a result of a simplified drug examination, a response to requests for appraisal, and a subsequent statement (one copy of a suspect's results of an appraisal);

1. Maurgraphic photo;