However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who was in a de facto marital relationship with the victim C from October 2010 to August 2013.

1. On February 1, 2013, the Defendant causing property damage: (a) around 21:00, the victim C and the Defendant living together with the victim in Seopopo City D for the reason that the said victim said that the said victim “ would manage the passbook from this year”; (b) caused the said victim’s misunderstanding of TV amount equivalent to one million won in the market price, which is the victim’s ownership, thereby damaging TV amount; and (c) caused the damage to the market price by gathering gas sirens equivalent to 200,000 won in the market price, and electronic sirens equivalent to 400,000,000 won in the market price, which are owned by the said victim.

2. On March 3, 2013, at around 01:10, the Defendant: (a) had frequent verbal disputes with the victim C at the above house; (b) entered the said house with the victim; and (c) had him/her spread to the entrance door via the gate by putting the clothes of the clothes and the fluor and fluor with the fluor with the fluor’s inner floor.

Accordingly, the above victim and the defendant destroyed the fire so that the market prices can be repaired by burning the inner floor, entrance, etc. of the building used as a residence.

3. Larceny;

A. At around 12:00 on August 26, 2013, the Defendant, without the consent of the victim C, took one copy of the agricultural bank deposit passbook (Account Number E) in the above victim’s name, which was kept inside the bank, and the said victim and the Defendant jointly occupied and used, stolen the said articles, with the above victim’s and the Defendant’s share of 10 million won in salary and Ⅲ at the market price in which they jointly occupied and used.

The written indictment contains each of the following: “The deposit passbook” and “the combination of winners III”. However, according to the records, it is clear that all of them are clerical errors. As such, the written indictment is corrected and recorded as above.

(hereinafter the same shall apply).

B. At around 18:18 on the same day, the Defendant entered the said agricultural cooperative deposit passbook in the name of the victim C in the cash automatic machines managed by the French victim installed therein in the detailed paper of Jeju-do and in advance.