However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2019. 12. 26. 03:45경 창원시 의창구 B에 있는 C 앞길에서 택시요금 문제로 112신고를 받고 출동한 창원서부경찰서 D파출소 소속 경위 E로부터 택시요금을 지불하고 귀가할 것을 요구받자 화가 나, “내가 뭘 잘못했는데 씨발”이라고 욕설을 하였고 이에 같이 출동한 경찰관인 F로부터 제지당하자, “야 이 씨발 놈아”라고 하며 피고인의 머리 부위로 위 경찰관 F의 이마 부위를 1회 들이받았다.

Accordingly, the defendant received 112 reports and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and investigation of crimes by police officers dispatched.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment (including the degree of imprisonment, the nature of the crime, the circumstances leading to the crime, and the fact that there has been sufficient force

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1));

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act regarding community service order;