beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2016.08.17 2016고단523

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The Defendant shall pay 240,000 won to the applicant C and D, respectively.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[criminal history] On February 13, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud in the Vice-Support of the Incheon District Court on February 13, 2015, and the enforcement of the sentence was terminated at the Incheon Detention Center on July 25, 2015.

"2016 Highest 523"

1. On December 2, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “I sell Soviet mobile phones so far as gallon jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus jus 365,00 won.”

However, since the defendant did not have a so-called mobile phone at the time gallon, even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the above mobile phone.

At around 15:59 of the same day from the person who was accused of the victim as above, the Defendant received KRW 365,000 from the new bank account (Account Number (F) in the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 5,482,000 from that time by the same method until April 6, 2016, as shown in the List of Crimes 1 in the same manner as shown in the List of Crimes 1.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive property.

2. On February 7, 2016, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would transfer money of 70% (70%) of the settlement amount if he/she would pay instead of the game capital of “My original” in his/her mobile game” on the Internet Nurier’s bulletin board, and that “the Defendant would transfer money of 385,000 won (70%) of the settlement amount if he/she makes a settlement instead of the amount of KRW 50,000 when he/she makes a mobile game capital to the victim G who reported it.”

However, the defendant did not have any intent to remit the above money to the victim even if the victim would pay the money instead of the game capital, and the fact was that the victim would have sold the game capital instead of the victim to another person to prepare cash.

The defendant is the victim as above.