An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

2...

[criminal records] Defendant F was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Eastern District Court on June 19, 2014, and the execution of the above sentence was terminated at the Dong Dong District Court on June 18, 2015.

[2] Defendant A, a R’s operator, experienced a financial shortage from early 2016 when she received a similar receipt hub, thereby soliciting investors in the face of KRW 50 million. The Defendants 3659, the Republic of Korea (“R”) established in S on October 26, 2012.

The proposal was received, and the purpose was to attract investors in such a way as guaranteeing the profit of the principal and above, together with U (O) and V (Seoul Center head) introduced by T.

Defendant

A served as the general role of Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, Defendant G, etc. in overall management of the project, including holding a business briefing session at the R plant and managing investment funds, and as the person participating in R’s investment products from Defendant A, U, etc., and the head of the Daejeon Center from August 16, 2016 to November 19, 2016, Defendant B served as the head of the Jeonju Center from August 18, 2016 to December 8, 2016, and the head of the Jeonju Center from September 2, 2016 to November 11, 2016 to explain the investment products to be offered by investors (the head of the Jinju Center from September 11, 2016 to December 16, 2016 to July 16, 2016, and the head of the Daejeon Center from July 16, 2016 to December 16, 2016.

The indictment of the 2017 Highest 3659 case states that “Defendant D was the head of the Daegu Center from September 5, 2016 to November 16, 2016.” However, in light of Defendant D’s assertion, witness A, and the legal statement of Defendant D, there is reasonable doubt that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor was the head of the Daegu Center.