2. The circumstances are considered in light of the following: (a) the Defendant recognized each of the instant offenses; (b) partially returned thiefs to the victim; and (c) the Defendant did not want the punishment of the Defendant by mutual consent with some larceny victims.

However, the number of the larceny crimes of this case reaches 11 times in total, and the amount of damage reaches 36 million won in total, but most victims want to be punished by the defendant because most of the defendants failed to pay damages to the victims of larceny or receive a letter of suspicion, and the defendant has already been punished by larceny, etc., and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case again in 2 years and 6 months after being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor due to larceny, etc. in the original judgment, and committed each of the crimes of this case again in 6 months and 6 months after being released from prison, and other factors of sentencing indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, etc., are considered in consideration of various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as punishment of the court below against the defendant is not unfair and too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.