Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On November 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 12:19 on November 4, 2014, at the office of the Defendant located on the third floor of the building located in Gangwon-gun, Gangwon-do; (b) the enforcement officer D, who was affiliated with the Chuncheon District Court, attached 14 points of the goods owned by the Defendant under the creditor-based law firm E 2014No583, the Defendant’s husband’s husband attached the 14 points of the goods such as one computer owned by the Defendant and attached a seizure mark; (c) however, the Defendant’s husband F, without the enforcement officer’s approval, assisted the Defendant’s act of not actively aiding and abetting the Defendant’s act of seizing 1, 1, and 1, 1, in a container stuff located on the 1st floor of the above Defendant’s house; and (d) in a childcare center located on the 1st floor of the above building by being aware of the location of the HP.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused (including F's statement part);

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the direct charge;

1. Article 140 (1) and Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 32(2) and 55(1)6 of the Criminal Act for aiding and abetting and mitigation;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Aiding and abetting under the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act not only facilitates the implementation of a principal offender by commission, but also where a person who is obligated to perform duties makes it easy to implement a principal offender due to omission, which does not take all measures to prevent the principal offender’s criminal act but also makes it easy. In order to recognize a crime of omission under the Criminal Act, legal duty to act to prevent infringement of legal interests prohibited under the Criminal Act is imposed.