If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

피고인은 2015. 6. 24. 03:30 경 서울 중구 C에 있는 자신이 운영하는 'D' 주점에서 손님인 E과 술값 문제로 시비가 되어 이에 112 신고를 받고 출동한 F 파출소 소속 경장 G으로부터 사건 경위 등에 관한 질문을 받자 위 G에게 "야 이 씹할! 개 같은 년 아! 니가 뭔 데 난리야, 이 썅년아!" 라는 등의 심한 욕설을 하며 G을 밀치는 등 폭행하고, 계속하여 같은 파출소 소속 순경 H으로부터 제지를 당하자 위 H을 밀치고 손톱으로 H의 양팔을 할퀴며 들고 있던

The police officers assaulted the He's left knife once with knife, and assaulted the knife knife of I's knife to knife the knife of I's knife with the knife, and interfered with the police officers' legitimate execution of duties concerning the 112 reporting duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G, H and I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing scams of violence against victims;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the recognition of the instant crime, and there is no record of the crime in 199, except for the punishment of a fine imposed once due to a different kind of crime from the instant crime, and it appears that the Defendant committed the instant crime by drinking and contingently, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records, including the motive and background leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, occupation, etc., shall be determined as ordered by the disposition.