However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 15:00, the Victim C, operated by the Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu Dong-gu, with the need to cut off a computer monitor installed at that place, and (b) the Defendant was aware of the need to cut off a computer monitor installed at that place, and (c) the Defendant took one computer monitor at a cost equivalent to KRW 300,000,000, in the market value of the victim’s ownership installed at that place, through an emergency stairs.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property together with the above E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to C and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment to court rulings);

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do134, Jan. 1, 201; 201Do134, Jan. 2,

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more (the grounds for discretionary mitigation are repeated);