However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 5, 2013, at around 19:58, the Defendant driven C Kaman vehicle in the section of about 10km from the roads located in the Jeju-gun of the Gangwon-gun without a driver’s license to the roads located in the Gangwon-si of the Gangwon-si to the drawing and flooder located in the drawing and painting of the 10km.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control results of drinking driving, report on the state of drinking drivers' statement, and application of the statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (2) 2, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant had the record of being punished three times due to drinking and unlicensed driving, and the crime was committed in this case even though he had the record of having been sentenced to imprisonment (six months of imprisonment), and the blood alcohol concentration is very high, and it is very good that the crime is committed in light of the fact that he has not obtained a driver's license on one occasion.

However, since 2009, there is no record of punishment for drinking or unlicensed driving, and the defendant is in profoundly against himself while making a confession of the crime of this case, and the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account all other factors of sentencing.