except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 01:00 on July 8, 2013, the Defendant, at the “E” office of the Victim D (A, 46 years of age) operated by Silung City, talked about the personal conditions of the victim known to him, and asked him to do so, and even though he was the victim, he was the victim. However, the Defendant got the victim’s face one time by drinking, and her head was the beer who was a dangerous object in the table.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous things with the victim and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a head cover which requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (D);

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the fact that the damage has not been relatively heavy);

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Taking into account that the defendant reflects the error and that he agreed with