However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On July 30, 2013, around 13:55 on July 30, 2013, the Defendant was under dispute with the above restaurant employee D and was under disturbance due to the drinking value problem in the restaurant “C”, and the Defendant was under dispute with the above restaurant employee D. The Defendant was, upon receiving a report, in order to restrain the Defendant, the police slopeF (40 years of age) of the police officer affiliated with the E Zone E Zone of the victim, who was called out after receiving the report, and the victim knew that he was a police officer performing his duties, such as the victim was under the uniform at the time, and was able to brea

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim and interfered with legitimate execution of duties for the maintenance of public order and suppression of crime.

Summary of Evidence

Application of each police statement law to Defendant’s legal statement, F, and D

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of a sentence, and the choice of imprisonment ( considered the records of violent crimes of the accused);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;