If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

At around 22:30 on October 3, 201, the Defendant: (a) inflicted injury on the victim E (Nam, 49 years of age) who is a staff member of the East-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “D” office; (b) and on the ground that the victim expressed the victim’s desire to be “heat” after the body fighting from the opening of the table, the Defendant took part in the victim’s face at a drinking time, such as the victim’s spashion on the floor, and spathing the victim’s spath, etc. on the floor, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement of police statement concerning E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. On October 3, 201, the Defendant: (a) around 22:30 on October 3, 201, at the office of “D” located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu; (b) the kitchen gate (the total length of 31cm and 20cm length) which is a dangerous object in the kitchen located in the kitchen; and (c) the Defendant carried a dangerous object and threatened the victim E by carrying it.

2. According to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, E testified to the effect that “E was aware of the following circumstances: (i) during the course of assaulting by the Defendant from the Defendant, there was an office outside of the said office; (ii) during the first-half minutes of the office, the Defendant knifeed the Defendant’s knife and immediately fleded from the office; and (iii) at the time, E testified to the effect that “E was unable to hear other evidence other than its own statement from the investigative agency on October 28, 2010; and (iv) on January 2, 2011, F was present at the investigative agency to ask whether there was any other evidence other than its own statement; and (v) however, F appeared at the investigative agency on January 2, 201, and E wrap.